Spontaneous and continuous dynamics
Use this category when no single supplied event train defines the question. The methods keep acquisition gaps and state boundaries explicit rather than treating a recording as one uninterrupted stationary signal.
Choose the workflow
| Need | Workflow | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Detect candidate fluorescence transients, then quantify their rate and kinetics | Spontaneous transients | Experimental |
| Estimate autocorrelation, PSD, spectrograms, or state-conditioned band power | Time, frequency, and state analysis | Experimental |
| Summarize seconds-to-hours windows with explicit coverage | Multiscale long-duration summaries | Experimental |
Required distinctions
- Candidate detection is separate from waveform quantification.
- Missing acquisition time is separate from a low signal value.
- A fluorescence transient is not automatically a neurotransmitter-release event.
- Spectral power is descriptive unless the sampling, window, null, and independent unit support the stronger claim.
- “Tonic” and “phasic” are biological interpretations, not labels inferred from a timescale alone.
Coverage gaps this category exposes
- manually adjudicated and synthetic-injection detector benchmarks;
- point-process and marked-event models at the animal level;
- wavelet and cross-frequency workflows with gap-aware nulls;
- change-point and latent-state models that preserve uncertainty; and
- public paper-figure reproductions spanning sensors, tasks, and acquisition systems.
For relationships among simultaneous signals, continue to multi-signal and spatial analysis.